Comments on: Point by point or whole route http://note19.com/2007/05/27/kml/ Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:32:29 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: ragrawal http://note19.com/2007/05/27/kml/#comment-1661 ragrawal Sat, 31 May 2008 20:46:09 +0000 http://note19.com/2007/05/27/kml/#comment-1661 hi, Interesting. I was thinking the same that a single line will be more efficient than having multiple points. Nevertheless, there is one problem when using multiple markers especially when you have more than 200 markers. Google only shows 200 markers at most in one go. You will need to click on next button to see other points. Check my post to see exactly what I have been trying to do http://ragrawal.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/garmin-forerunner-301-to-google-maps/ hi,

Interesting. I was thinking the same that a single line will be more efficient than having multiple points. Nevertheless, there is one problem when using multiple markers especially when you have more than 200 markers. Google only shows 200 markers at most in one go. You will need to click on next button to see other points. Check my post to see exactly what I have been trying to do
http://ragrawal.wordpress.com/2008/05/31/garmin-forerunner-301-to-google-maps/

]]> By: Tobias Hoellrich http://note19.com/2007/05/27/kml/#comment-9 Tobias Hoellrich Mon, 28 May 2007 16:13:53 +0000 http://note19.com/2007/05/27/kml/#comment-9 Personally I think that the point-by-point example runs faster here (MacOS X, Camino) and yields "better" results. For the whole-route example it almost looks like somebody is doing a spline-interpolation between way-points. While it is not a problem with the sampling rate you used, it may look weird if the sampling frequency is decreased (means, less samples per time). Personally I think that the point-by-point example runs faster here (MacOS X, Camino) and yields “better” results. For the whole-route example it almost looks like somebody is doing a spline-interpolation between way-points. While it is not a problem with the sampling rate you used, it may look weird if the sampling frequency is decreased (means, less samples per time).

]]>